QD vs LD Bridge Crane: Tonnage, Span, and Cost Guide
The QD-type double-girder bridge crane (heavy-duty flagship), LD-type electric single-girder crane (budget option), and LH-type hoist bridge crane (mid-range solution) are the three most common overhead crane configurations. This article compares them across six key parameters—lifting capacity, span, work duty, and cost—to help you make the right choice.
Why Compare These Three Overhead Crane Types?
When selecting lifting equipment for a workshop or factory building, the QD-type double-girder bridge crane (twin-girder overhead crane), LD-type electric single-girder bridge crane, and LH-type hoist bridge crane are the three configurations you'll most often weigh. Although they all fall under the overhead crane category, they differ dramatically in main girder design, hoisting mechanism, work duty, and price—choose wrong and you'll either overspend on capacity you don't need or stall your production line. This article benchmarks them across six parameters: lifting capacity, span, lifting height, work duty, cost, and application scenarios, so procurement decision-makers can quickly zero in on the optimal fit.
Model Overview: QD, LD, and LH Cranes
QD-Type Double-Girder Bridge Crane
The QD-type double-girder bridge crane (twin-girder overhead crane) features twin main girders with a winch-based hoisting mechanism—a dedicated hoist winch assembly (motor + gearbox + drum + pulley block + hook block). It's the heavy-duty flagship of the overhead crane family. Lifting capacity ranges from 5 to 500 t, spans 10–35 m, lifting heights reach 12–32 m, and work duty classifications span A5 to A8. This is the go-to choice for continuous, high-frequency, heavy-load production environments.
LD-Type Electric Single-Girder Bridge Crane
The LD-type uses a simplified single main girder with an electric hoist for lifting. The main girder combines a box-section with an I-beam runway, and the electric hoist (CD1/MD1 models) travels along the bottom flange of the beam. Lifting capacity: 1–20 t, span: 7.5–28 m, lifting height: 6–30 m, work duty: A3 to A5. Thanks to its simple construction and low manufacturing cost, it's the most economical overhead crane option for small-to-medium workshops.
LH-Type Hoist Bridge Crane
The LH-type is the middle-ground solution: twin main girders for lateral stability and long-span capability, but with an electric hoist instead of a winch for lifting. Lifting capacity: 5–32 t (up to 50 t in select configurations), span: 10–30 m, lifting height: 6–24 m, work duty: A3 to A5. Think of it as the "upgraded" LD or the "economy" QD—it fills the gap between single-girder simplicity and winch-driven double-girder performance.
Key Comparison Parameters
Lifting Capacity Range
| Model | Lifting Capacity Range | Most Common Capacity |
| QD Type Double-Girder Bridge Crane | 5~500t | 10t / 16t / 20t / 32t / 50t / 75t / 100t |
| LH Type | 5~50t(Common5~32t) | 5t / 10t / 16t / 20t / 32t |
| LD Type | 1~20t | 1t / 3t / 5t / 10t / 16t / 20t |
Bottom line: For lifting capacities up to 20 t, all three models are viable options. In the 20–32 t range, the QD and LH models compete head-to-head. Above 32 t, the QD-type double-girder bridge crane is the only suitable choice. For heavy-duty applications exceeding 50 t, the QD is the sole option.
Span Range
| Model | Span Range | Maximum Economical Span |
| QD Type Double-Girder Bridge Crane | 10~35m | 31.5m |
| LH Type | 10~30m | 25.5m |
| LD Type | 7.5~28m | 22.5m |
Bottom line: When span ≥ 28m, the LD type falls short; at span ≥ 30m, the LH type approaches its ceiling. For large spans (≥ 25m) combined with heavier lifting capacities, the QD-type double-girder bridge crane is the preferred choice—its twin main girders deliver superior bending stiffness and reduced deflection.
Lifting Height
The LD type offers a standard lifting height of 6–12m (extendable to 30m), the LH type 6–18m (extendable to 24m), and the QD type 12–16m (extendable to 32m). The QD's hoist winch mechanism achieves greater maximum lifting heights by varying wire rope winding layers and drum length, making it well-suited for high-bay factory buildings.
Bottom line: When lifting height requirements exceed 20m, the QD type holds a clear advantage.
Work Duty Classification (A3–A7)
Work duty is the most overlooked yet critical parameter in bridge crane selection: A3 (light duty) suits intermittent use with infrequent full loads; A5 (medium duty) handles moderate frequency with regular full loads; A7 (heavy duty) is built for high-frequency, continuous full-load operation.
| Model | Work Duty / Classification Range | Typical Applications |
| QD Type Double-Girder Bridge Crane | A5~A8 | Metallurgical, Casting, Heavy Duty Machinery Fabrication |
| LH Type | A3~A5 | General Purpose Machinery, Assembly, Warehousing |
| LD Type | A3~A5 | Light Industry, Maintenance, Warehouse |
Kelude Heavy Industry's technical lead points out: “Many customers only compare lifting capacity and price, overlooking the work duty classification. For two 20t overhead cranes, the manufacturing cost difference between A5 and A7 can reach 30–40%. Selecting a lower duty class for high-frequency, heavy-load applications will significantly shorten the equipment's service life.”
Bottom line: When the required work duty is A6 or higher, the QD Type double-girder bridge crane is the only viable option; for A3 to A5 applications, both LD and LH models can meet the demand.
Cost & Price Comparison
Estimated based on a 10t lifting capacity, 22.5m span, and 12m lifting height:
| Model | Reference Price(10K CNY) | Relative Cost Ratio |
| LD Type | 5~9 | 100%(Baseline) |
| LH Type | 10~16 | 170~180% |
| QD Type Double-Girder Bridge Crane | 15~30 | 250~330% |
The higher cost of the QD type comes down to three factors: the twin main girders require 2 to 2.5 times more steel than a single-girder design; the hoisting mechanism—complete with its own motor, gearbox, drum, pulley block, and brake—is far more complex than an electric hoist; and it also demands twin trolley rails plus a more sophisticated electrical control system.
Bottom line: If your budget is tight and lifting capacity requirements are modest, go with the LD type. When you need the stability of a double-girder crane but have limited funds, the LH type is the sweet spot. For heavy-duty, high-frequency operations, the QD-type double-girder bridge crane is the only real choice.
Application Scenarios
- QD-type double-girder bridge crane: Steel mill foundries (handling ladles of molten steel or iron), heavy machinery workshops (large workpiece assembly), hydroelectric power stations (turbine installation and maintenance), shipyards (sectional hoisting), and high-capacity warehouses—in short, any facility that runs at full load day in and day out should prioritize the QD type.
- LH type: Medium-sized steel fabrication shops, general machine shops, equipment installation and repair, and mid-size warehouses—applications with moderate duty cycles and lighter loads that still need the span of a double-girder crane.
- LD type: Light assembly lines, small repair workshops, basic warehouses, school training labs, and other intermittent light-duty applications.
Full Parameter Comparison Table
| Comparison Item | QD Type Double-Girder Bridge Crane | LH Type | LD Type |
| Main Girder Configuration | twin main girders | twin main girders | single main girder |
| Hoisting mechanism | Hoist Winch(Motor+Gearbox / Reducer+Drum) | Electric Hoist(CD1/MD1/HC) | Electric Hoist(CD1/MD1) |
| Lifting Capacity | 5~500t | 5~50t(Common5~32t) | 1~20t |
| Span | 10~35m | 10~30m | 7.5~28m |
| Lifting Height | 12~32m | 6~24m | 6~30m |
| Work Duty / Classification | A5~A8 | A3~A5 | A3~A5 |
| travel speed | 20~30m/min | 20~30m/min | 20~30m/min |
| trolley speed | 20~30m/min | 20m/min | 20m/min |
| Lifting Speed | 2~12m/min(Multiple Options Available) | 8/0.8m/min(Two-Speed) | 8/0.8m/min(Two-Speed) |
| Relative Cost | 250~330%(Highest Cost) | 170~180%(Medium) | 100%(Baseline, Lowest Cost) |
| Application Scenarios | Heavy Load, High Frequency/Continuous Duty | Moderate Duty/double girder Requirement | Light Load, Low Frequency/Economical Solution |
3-Step Crane Selection Process
Step 1: Filter by Lifting Capacity
- ≤5t: LD Type is the priority choice (lowest cost, fully sufficient). For capacities above 20t, skip the LD option entirely.
- 5–20t: All three models remain viable candidates—proceed to Step 2.
- 20–32t: Eliminate the LD Type. Choose between the QD Type Double-Girder Bridge Crane and the LH Type.
- ≥32t: Go directly with the QD Type—the LH Type is no longer economically justifiable at this capacity.
Step 2: Confirm by Work Duty Classification
- If the required work duty is A6/A7/A8, select the QD Type Double-Girder Bridge Crane directly—neither the LD nor LH Type supports these classifications.
- For work duty A3–A5, keep all candidate models and proceed to Step 3.
Step 3: Decide Based on Budget and Application
- Sufficient budget (≥¥250,000 per unit) with a focus on full-lifecycle reliability: Choose the QD Type Double-Girder Bridge Crane. Although the initial investment is 40–60% higher, the hoist winch mechanism delivers over 30% lower combined maintenance costs over a 10-year operating period compared to electric hoist types (the gearbox, brake, and wire rope on electric hoists require far more frequent replacement than winch systems).
- Mid-range budget (¥120,000–180,000 per unit) with moderate lifting capacity: Choose the LH Type, which uses a double-girder configuration for better operational stability and smoother trolley travel.
- Limited budget (≤¥100,000 per unit) with low usage frequency: Choose the LD Type for the best cost-performance ratio. For intermittent duty cycles not exceeding 2,000 hours per year, the LD Type saves ¥10,000–30,000 annually in maintenance costs compared to over-investing in a double-girder system.
Kelude Heavy Industry—Full-Series Bridge Crane Selection Support
Henan Kelude Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. (k.qizhongji.com) offers design, manufacturing, and installation services for the complete range of bridge cranes, including the QD Type Double-Girder Bridge Crane, LD Type, LH Type, and explosion-proof/metallurgical models. For projects where crane selection is uncertain, the Kelude Heavy Industry sales engineering team provides complimentary selection assistance—simply supply the lifting capacity, span, lifting height, annual operating hours, and duty frequency, and an engineer will issue a detailed model recommendation, preliminary configuration proposal, and budget estimate within 24 hours. Call or chat online with our support team to get started.
To compare specifications and pricing across the full bridge crane series, see the Bridge Crane Full-Series Comparison Chart—a single table that breaks down the differences between the LD, QD, LH, LB, and LDY models.
Related Standards
• ISO 4306-7:2008 Cranes—Vocabulary—Part 7: Floating Cranes
• ISO 12480-2:2008 Cranes—Safe Use—Part 2: Mobile Cranes
• ISO 12480-5:2012 Cranes—Safe Use—Part 5: Bridge and Gantry Cranes
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: How large is the price gap between the QD Type and LD Type?
A: Using a 10t/22.5m configuration as an example, the LD Type is priced at approximately ¥50,000–90,000, the LH Type at ¥100,000–160,000, and the QD Type at ¥150,000–300,000. The QD Type costs roughly 150–200% more than the LD Type, primarily because the twin main girders require twice the steel, and the hoist winch mechanism plus electrical control systems are significantly more complex.
Q: Up to what lifting capacity is the LD Type suitable?
A: The LD Type can handle lifting capacities up to 20t, but the work duty classification must also be considered. If the crane runs more than 4 hours per day with frequent full-load operation, upgrading to the LH or QD Type is recommended even at capacities below 20t. Kelude Heavy Industry's guidance: LD Type for intermittent use under 20t; QD Type for frequent heavy-duty operation under 20t.
Q: Can the LH Type electric hoist bridge crane replace the QD Type?
A: Not fully. The LH Type has a maximum lifting capacity of 50t and a work duty of A3–A5, covering only the low-to-mid range of QD Type applications. For capacities above 50t or work duty classifications of A6 and higher, the QD Type is mandatory. The LH Type's advantages: 30–40% lower cost with the same double-girder configuration, plus better headroom clearance.
Q: How does an oversized span affect crane selection?
A: The LD Type has a maximum economic span of 22.5m (31.5m absolute limit). Beyond this span, a double-girder configuration is required. The LH Type supports spans up to 31.5m, while the QD Type can reach 35m and beyond. The larger the span, the greater the demands on main girder stiffness and bending resistance—double-girder designs offer a decisive advantage at spans of 25m and above.